Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W. people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.


The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States” - 
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]

And it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, they hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization


A story from under one of my unlikely other hats, as a bona fide sometime historian of Brazil, or brasilianista (see my Cruzeiro do Sul, A History of Brazil’s Half-Millennium, Vol. 1 and 2, available on In the early colonial days, under the rocky regime of the fledgling colony’s second governor-general, Duarte da Costa, the resident Portuguese Jesuits, South America’s very first cadre of clerics, petitioned the king in Lisbon to declare Brazil a separate jurisdiction from the Azores and send to the sprawling coast a bishop of its own. Hence, the strict King João III’s choice, the austere Dom Pedro Fernandes Sardinha, a classic drudge and martinet, was sent across, and immediately threatened the charmed progress the almost Renaissance-minded mere handful of Jesuits had made in pacifying the Indians, mainly the widespread Tupi tribal people. Receiving complaints, the king recalled the equally austere bishop for consultation.

But only a few hundred kilometers up the coast, the ship transporting him ran aground, and he and reportedly about a hundred other unlucky passengers and crew were quickly nabbed and eaten by the local Caete natives.

The point is that for the next century or more, revenge for the ghastly crime against Brazil’s first bishop was cited time after time after time after time as the pretext for successive genocidal slaughters of Brazilian Indians of whatever allegiance or band, mounting into quite likely millions and utter extermination from almost the entire eastern half of the continent-size country.

There is only one – but absolutely critical – difference between that more than extravagantly abused pretext for an egregious, heartless and endless genocidal hecatomb, and the one unstintingly exercised by the U.S. in the Middle East and broader environs today. And that is that that pretext in the one instance really (or, at least, apparently) did happen as portrayed by the “authorities”; whereas the way it was told in which 9/11 befell and its authors was expressly made up and drummed into the mentality of the American nation and world as a shamelessly false myth – a lie. A lie or myth that emphatically had to be true (although, small detail, it was not) and absolutely had to be defended as true history, although it, of course, was anything but.

In fact, the motivation for the wholly unjustified U.S. invasion of, of all places, the Middle East, a first-line trade partner for seventy years by now and continuing, may have been a desire to hijack or pirate valuable strategic materials, and more plausibly to control strategic space. But it had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. That was a lie of truly imperial proportions, which in turn necessitated the spinning and promulgation as truths of more wholesale state-sanctioned whoppers.

Outright lies. Namely, that the Middle East was full of and teeming with irrational, hate-filled demons hell-bent on the destruction of the entire west, not just the United States, to make way for an imagined (or hallucinated) sick, perverted faux-Islamic ascendancy and permanent reign of slavery over the whole infidel earth. The reason the U.S. couldn’t ever even try to negotiate with them was inferred to be their certain-to-be utterly scrambled and rabidly worse-than-worthless diabolical brains.

The vast add-on lie invoked here, of course, is that first al-Qaeda and then ISIL (or ISIS), two U.S. creations and puppet organizations, respectively, were and are actually the military and cerebral spearheads of a diabolic Middle Eastern militancy, even going so far as to deal through deadly offshoots and rogues to criminally attack targets in North America, Europe, and as far afield as Bangladesh and Bali. All of which, of course, were strategically orchestrated lies to prop up more basic lies in lieu of in-house actual perpetration, designed to and extend the effectiveness of the original lie, an unbelievably consequential narrative endangering and lethally attacking ultimately the whole world of Muslim human beings wherever they are and unrightfully occupying the business of the planet at least for decades. Whoever knows and cares must surely act to bring an end to the monstrous foundational lies spun literally out of nothing but fevered criminal imaginations – very much like fiat money, and likewise employed to control the world for an otherwise utterly creedless, psychotic, tiny global élite.

The true battle today is between these tip-top élite control selfist-globalists and the – to them – deplorable nationalists who want to divert control back to the discretion of the world’s masses and seven billion individuals as autonomous actors.

Which has, almost by default, become the real message of Donald Trump, a warrior candidate for U.S. president and self-acclaimed standard-bearer against globalism, who, though he keeps tripping over his own baggage, nevertheless also calls out the lies of its agents, truthfully declaring Hillary and Obama the “founders of ISIS” and rightly blaming the George W. Bush administration for 9/11. This, while not daring to go so far (as yet) with either well-based claim as to tighten the noose already around his neck.

Now, he calls out their ever-more-obvious (and precedented!) rigging of the whole electoral system, and he has them furious and at the same time quaking in their brazen boots. He may well lose, a victim of himself and that which he decries. But he has quite patriotically tipped off many millions of his countrymen and heartened the multitude of co-claimants to the power, formerly undisputed, that’s long been clamped down over them.

Unlike in the case of the ridiculously long-lasting pretext used for slaughtering up to millions of understandably hostile others in colonial Brazil, where the miniscule communities of settlers really were seemingly forever in a situation of permanent grave danger, the contrived onslaught carried on, on, and on by the U.S.-driven west and its lackeys, is based upon an elaborate, fragile and tantalizingly vulnerable superstructure of lies.

The Russians, the new declared enemy and fly in the corrupt American establishment’s ointment, with its spectacularly enraging constant bombardment of America’s wholly-controlled ISIS patsies, who our authorities naturally cannot acknowledge as such, are chipping away at the lie – running the solemnly warned risk of thermonuclear war, the only disincentive with a possibility to dissuade them. And if, as alleged, they are also hacking into and revealing publicly machinations of the U.S. establishment and its deceitfully-selected new leaders, they are, whether we like it or not, further serving the interests of the truth through Wikileaks.

Let truth be forever the banner for us all, and again may it prevail and wave free! “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

JH: 10/18/16

Top 5 Clinton scandals you’re missing due to media bias